Just for something different today we’ll run with this article from the web.. its something we should all give some thought to and ask our local member why this is so:
BRIGALOW CORPORATION and FEE SIMPLE LAND RIGHTS - BRIGALOW CORPORATION NOW OWNS THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND & SOON NSW
BRIGALOW and FEE SIMPLE LAND RIGHTS
“On Thursday 3rd October 2007, the High Court of Australia made rulings over residential and rural land that effectively removes all land ownership from the people of Queensland and puts it squarely into the hands of our State Government.
The court ruling that ‘fee simple’ and the ‘common law’ are now no longer recognised in Queensland means we no longer are part of the Commonwealth and no longer have ownership or say in our land, that Queensland is a separate entity that can make its own laws. ” (all other states are to follow )
BRIGALOW is A CORPORATION OWNED BY QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT WHICH HOLDS ALL LANDRIGHTS IN QLD INCLUDING YOUR LAND AS THE HIGH COURT HAS REMOVED YOUR RIGHT TO OWN LAND IN FEE SIMPLE
If you want further info look up Google and type in Brigalow Corporation - apparently they in NSW are going to / if they have not already - implement same absolute bastardy into NSW. None dare call it treason!
Google for Brigalow Corporation:
www.google.com.au : http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=Brigalow+Corporation+&btnG=Googl…
www.google.com : http://www.google.com/search?q=Brigalow+Corporation+&sourceid=ie7&rls=co…
Lots of information in relation to Land Rights - Fee Simple - Brigalow Corporation etc
hmmmm, a bit more evidence would be useful, perhaps the actual name of the case. The only case I can find that was handed down by the High Court on 3 Oct 07 is Westfield v Perpetual Trusttee; is that it? It deals with torrens title land, but more specifically on easements. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2007/45.html
Nate,
The situation is now to the stage that questions are being asked in State Parliament. I will copy it for you.
HANSARD
Thursday 30h April 2008
Question on Notice
681 MRS PRATT ASKED THE ATTORNEY–GENERAL AND MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND MINISTER ASSISTING THE PREMIER IN WESTERN QUEENSLAND (MR SHINE)— With reference to constituents who have raised concerns that the traditional common law rights attached to freehold land in Queensland have been extinguished, and as these concerns arose from a recent legal case where Judge McPherson JJA of the Queensland Court of Appeal in Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA120 stated ‘he retains unimpaired, for what it is worth, his estate in fee simple absolute in the land. He has been stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value’—
(1) What steps will the Queensland Government take to restore the rights of property owners?
(2) Are there any treaties, national and international, or any other mechanism by which the common law rights of freehold property in Queensland can be overridden?
(3) Who is the holder of public and private land title deeds?
Mrs. Pratt is the independent member for Nanago. I, for one, await the reply to her questions!
The case of Bone v Maitland referred to by the ex-One Nation MP Mrs Pratt is here: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/qld/QCA/2002/120.html
It is a case affirming the govenrment’s right to restrict wholesale land clearing; one of the pre-eminent environmental issues of our time. If there is indeed a traditional common law right to do whatever you want on freehold land it would extinguish 99% of all laws and completely neuter all levels of government from acting in the interests of society and the environment.
The most worrying thing about the changes that have been made to the Queensland constitution are -
1. Queensland legislative law now overrides Common law. This takes away one of the fundamental defences of our basic liberties. In every other other jurisdiction of Westminster law the acts passed by the legislature may be overturned by the courts if they contravene Common law. In Queensland they now cannot, therefore a single house parlament can now enact any law they wish with no practical review.
2. The judicary has been made an arm of the parlament of Queensland. Thus the seperation of the legislative and judicial powers has now been abolished in Queensland. The people of Queensland now have no protection from the power of the elected government. With a single house controlled by a massive majority under tight party control we are now effectively living in a dictatorship similar to Oliver Cromwells Commonwealth.
Taken with the removal of land title (one judge in Brisbane commented that the only right that the owner of land now has is the right to pay the rates and taxes) these 2 further constitutional changes mean that we are now living in a pre-Magna Carta state.
I thought we did pretty good as a democracy but I have friends from the plains states of the USA and they cannot believe that we tolerate the rate at which our protections and rights are being taken away without even the blink of an eye.
Jim,
I am interested in the points you raise:
1. Legislative law has ALWAYS over-ridden common law in EVERY common law country. This means that the decisions of the democratically elected representatives over-ride the decisions of judges appointed by the representatives. Why would you want it any other way? It would be dictatorship, would it not?
2. How have the courts become an arm of the parliament? (I think you really mean the executive) the Attorney General has lost quite a few cases this year - indefinate detention of some paedephiles etc.
I would really be interested to see a legal authority that land title has been stripped. There has to be some control over private land. If not, what is the function of local government? My neighbour presumably holds his title in fee simple, does that mean he can build a petrol station, brothel or 18 story development in our street? No, he cant, his fee simple has been restricted by a number of measures, state local and federal. His land is zoned medium residential, but it is still his land.
Nate,
It IS a dictatorship, and Jim, you are absolutely right.
Fee Simple and Common Law was abolished as of the 3rd October last year.
Rather than argue the point here, ad infinitum, there is a public meeting being held at Beerwah Community Hall next Saturday (31st May 200
at 1 pm, with speakers who have researched this matter in detail.
All and every issue will be presented by this informed group.
Collect a few of your mates and attend - as I intend to!
Surely the real question here people, is does anyone have the right to own land? I think not. Unless you support the “might is right” concept, the LAND all LAND is owned by the people and always has been. Land owned by the people should only be leased from the guardians of the people (government), never sold.
The whole system is built on a lie.
John,
The question should be that if you have ANY property, including your bank account, superannuation, etc, is anybody taking them from you committing theft?
If the info that has been circulating for last few months is correct then this is exactly what HAS happened. Land is only a part of the issue!
Jim MacKellar’s summary explains how this came about.
I for one will be at the Beerwah meeting looking for some answers.
Suggest that you be there too.
Pancho,I fail to see any likeness between my goods and chattels and land. In my view, as previously stated land should belong to us all. Since day one land has been won and lost by the power of the sword.
Current ownership is based on a lie.
John, if land ownership is based on a lie then why are you not refusing to pay council’s rates?
Take it to court and I bet you will lose!
However, the current issue is that the new Qld constitution transfers the ownership of ALL property to the State (this includes your underwear).
This came about by establishing a couple of legal precedents (Wilson v Raddatz and Glasgow v Hall). To quote Judge McPherson in the Qld Court of Appeal using the Bone v Mothershaw case he stated that we have been “stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of practical utility or value”
Yes, I agree with Nate that I am not giving suficient solid legal references, but I am only an uneducated voter with access to the internet, and as such I look forward to next Saturday’s presenation at Beerwah to expand my understanding of the issue.
John, I also look forward to meeting you at the Beerwah Community Hall next Saturday at 1 PM
Pancho,
I am not in agreement with ALL personal property reverting to the state, for from it. I am talking spacifically about land. Land as I have tried to indicate belongs, in my view to us (the people). To aquire land by force or just by squatting, does not give you ownership. The fact that this has gone on for centuries, does not make it right. I repeat our system is built on a lie.
John, there have been at least two systems of government where all land belongs to the crown. There was Fuedalism and Communism. Both have been proven to be not quite conducive to the improvement of the human condition.
Remember, under our system, prior to the latest changes, you never owned absolute title to any property. Firstly you only had the rights to the use of the top few feet, the rest remained the property of the crown. Secondly, your use was constrained by the principles of common law which prevented its use to cause damage to the community good. Therefore the government could place restrictions on the use of the land but not remove your ownership without proper compensation. Also, if the law was changed to prevent a use previously allowed the owner had to be compensated for any potential loses.
Given your hypothises that all land belongs to the people this then must then be extraporlated to the point where all land belongs to all the people on the face of the earth, as nations are, themselves, artificial constructs. So are you advocating that the ownership of all land should be vested in the UN.
Jim,
I like your last paragraph.
I would suggest the only difference to a ‘free’ people and an ’subjugated’ people is the right to own land.
Pancho,
I’m inclined to agree. However, it’s a long time since a “free” people walk the land. They now face fences, walls, ownership etc. Freedom went the same way as democracy, watered down til it becomes nonexistant.
John,
Then perhaps it is time to start turning the system around.
Let’s elect representatives who are prepared to “re-present the expressed majority wish of their constituents, without fear or favour” as per our Australian Constitution.
And to blazes with party politics, with their globalist agendas and bosses!
Or are we too late?
Pancho,
Firstly it is never too late. Regarding party politics, I’ve been opposed to it for a very long time and yes, the people need to review the situation we are in. Now comes the hard part, based on the last local government election. Apathy and lack of knowledge are rampant, most people know the names of more of their local footy team, than their local council!! But those that care need to keep talking about our situation,keep writting about it and keep hoping. As I started, it’s never too late.
In the last couple of years the world has qained the knowledge of Climate Change via Al Gore, please note that a barrel of oil was $40. To day with all the care monegering coming from governments,the price of oil today is now over $140, nobody benefits except the oil Cartels and coal mines.
The real solution to Climate Change is very simple, move from a Fossil Fuel Economy to one of a renewable fuel economy that does not emit new Green House gas. The second step is to stop paying the coal industries billions of tax dollars to clean up their act, instead severe fines should be imposed on these pollutors.
World wide all politician are looking for a solution to this problem, “so they claim”, but when shown a technical scientific solution, in the last 20 years they have ignored this solution, which is called the d’Oliveira Natural Gas Refinery, which has been researched by CSIRO (repot “No doubt that it works”
& Qld Deparment of Energy and Resources (1993) Griffith University 1996. In 1992 I showed the City of Brisbane how to convert their buses from diesel to natural gas
WE do have the solution, but governments keep on funding fossil fuel to clean up their act, or alternative solutions that at best only band aid solutions. The dNGR is a base energy solution, with zero waste product
What are you going to do, allow petrol to go up to $8 per litre, and watch electricity bill goup by 200% or even 300% over the next few years, because dispite Ann Blight qld Premier that she would look into my technowlegde on 30th June, not a single phone call has been returned over the last two week, and not a single news paper local or any TV station reported this question on their news, their silence on this matter is shows a definet siding with international Cartels, which has helped to erode our Democarcy of Australia.
Cy d’Oliveira
07 4125 5527
We today have to learn the basic fact about sewerage , and how it will effect our future. Sewerage is a toxic and health hazard to all life on our plant, whether , human, bird, plant, marine life, it will kill in concentrated strengths. The first fact of sewerage waster water ,is the composition thereof, and this consist of two main basic elements, namely organic and inorganic matter.
Organic matter is roughly 46% of total solids, and contains over 200 different viruses and bacteria deadly to mankind, this portion of solids can be dissipated by means of chemical reactions (either anaerobic or aerobic or heat over 65C)
Inorganic matter is another problem, as this basically a metal and cannot be altered by the same chemical process as organic material, so we are left with the arsenic, cyanide, mercury, lead and about another 19 other metals harmful to life on planet earth.
Both these substances in the modern society is removed from sewerage by a technology Known as Reverse Osmosis or Membrane technology (R/O) Todate they do not have a practical solution of getting rid of these harmful metals in an environmentally friendly manner. The solution taken in secrecy is to put this toxic waste down disued mine shafts (where the underground water is polluted for thousands of years) or to give it away to farmers as free fertilizer, which allows this toxic waste in concentrated amounts to re-enter our food chain, or else sold as garden fill, that will make people become sick from these solids when worked into garden soils will released toxic fumes.
To day our seas and rivers, lakes are being polluted unchecked. What a heritage to leave future generations.
Cy d’Oliveira
Today I would like to share some vital information with all pensioners, and workers, who one day will be pensioners.
In 1947 Ben Chiefly the then Prime Minister decided, that all Australian worker would be covered by a uniformed pension scheme to retire with dignity, and allowing them to have funds, so that they could pay their own way.
The rate to calculate this pension was to be 50% of average male weekly wage (based on the Australian Bureau of Statistic half yearly) plus a half yearly CPI index to be added to to keep the pension in-line with inflation. That was the formula. Australia is an OECD country also acknowledges that the poverty(starvation) rate is 40% of average weekly wage
Since 1975 the federal Government has based the pension rate at 25% of average weekly wage, left out the CPI. So under this changed formula over the last 43 years this is what the entitelment for pensioners today should be at 25% of ABS figures (document 63020 14May 200
based on an average adult male wage of $1132 should be $283 per week or per fortnight pension $566 , instead we are paid $546 without the CPI inflation of 4%, a shortfall of $20 per pension cheque, over a year we will receive $1040 less pension, during a time and period when the price of oil has been the highest in the world, which has increased the price of food as well(CPI), pensioners are funding the so called Kevin Rudds Utilities payment, and Rudd is making a 100% profit on the so called generosity extra funds for pensioners. The Rudd government is not acting in the ANZAC spirit,their actions are those of mean spirited ALLI BABBA and his 40 Thieves. Shame Shame on you Rudd!!!! Stealing from the poor and weak is very un-Australian, while you put $20 billion tax surplus money into politician pension funds to take care of yourselves , and to hell with the rest of Australia. May I remind all Australians you have one weapon to fight back with, and that is to unite at the next federal election, use the power of your vote to get rid of Rudd and his government out of power. Anybody, who would like to know more , please contact
me
Cy d’Oliveira
Hervey Bay
Tel 07 4125 5527